- Joined
- Aug 20, 2019
- Messages
- 3,546
- Reaction score
- 7,357
Awe yes sir. I got some cold water on my face. I'm alright now. I almost needed some paper towels. Thanks for that. Kind regards budLMAO !!!! EASY TIGER !!!!!
Awe yes sir. I got some cold water on my face. I'm alright now. I almost needed some paper towels. Thanks for that. Kind regards budLMAO !!!! EASY TIGER !!!!!
Thanks for starting this thread. I was thinking this the other day as I'm having decision paralysis on exactly what to buy in my first ML. Looks like I should start with a 45!
I would like to read how a 45 is a pound lighter. Unless that were the case, I see no reason to go below 50. The 50 cal is the standard size. For a first gun, always make the main stream, easy to feed decision. I think, no - start with a 50 and you may try more or less.
I gotta tell ya if i was truly really interested in this mz stuff id have started out a whole lot differently than i did . My first was a blued knight wolverine , the cheapest gun i could find brand new back then . It gave me fits !!!Thanks for starting this thread. I was thinking this the other day as I'm having decision paralysis on exactly what to buy in my first ML. Looks like I should start with a 45!
Exactly!! A .41 is illegal in Utah, but you can shoot a .40 out of a .45 cal sabot and not be bothered...Not to be a downer, but there are some states that restrict what you can hunt with a 45. Seems silly to me. A 45 bullet from a 50 rifle is no different than a 45 from a 45. Not well thought up. Guess they were just thinking about round balls. Otherwise, it makes no sense.
My buddy flounder likes conicals !!! Thats Why we own Whites , one of The Best conical shooters Ever offered !!! True 200 yd accuracy with hammer of thor authority !!!
I feel the key to Docs success in one of the most accurate off-the-shelf rifles, is the shallow rifling. Bullet truly does fill and seal the bore shooting that heavy lead... if you ever want to get rid of Mity Whitey, make sure you give me a call...Ya dang near gave me a chubby there Sideshow. Lol
Hows about i look for his brother for ya ?? Mighty Whitey and i got a "Thing" going on !!!I feel the key to Docs success in one of the most accurate off-the-shelf rifles, is the shallow rifling. Bullet truly does fill and seal the bore shooting that heavy lead... if you ever want to get rid of Mity Whitey, make sure you give me a call...
Depends on where you hunt, average here is double that then some. That’s probably the average for the archers... almost all my deer with a rifle (black powder or centerfire) are taken at plus 100 yds..For the average 50-75 yard shot at a deer, won’t matter a bit if 45 or 50 cal.
I knew I spelled that wrong when I typed it....Hows about i look for his brother for ya ?? Mighty Whitey and i got a "Thing" going on !!!
I would LOVE a .41 S91Hows about i look for his brother for ya ?? Mighty Whitey and i got a "Thing" going on !!!
They Absolutely Rock !!! I will keep my eyes peeled for one Stacy . I see them now and then . Ole Sideshow's a pretty good bird dog ya know......lolI would LOVE a .41 S91
Great info. TY! Do you have any idea what your Muzzle velocity is using 70gr by weight of BH209, while shooting the .40cal 200g XTP & Barnes 196g? Are you still using that same 70gr load for deer hunting. Experimenting with my new .45 Accura MR-X. Do you find that 75gr or 80gr is too much for these bullets? (I own the same bullets/sabots & will be using BH209 also)I have both .50 and .45 cal inlines and both kill deer very effectively for me. I'm strictly a sabot shooter and I don't play with any of the big heavy lead. Inside of my 100 yard sight-in I can't see any advantage one over the other in accuracy and as far as killing power goes they both are superb. My .45 cal shoots both a 200 grain XTP and a Barnes 196 grain into the same holes at 100 yards without any scope changes using 70 grains weighed of 209 powder. Two of my .50's will shoot 300 grain ,44 cal XTPs and Barnes 250 Xpanders into the same holes at 100 yards without any scope changes using the same 77 grains by weight of 209 powder.
Both calibers are very flexible for me. Unless you're hell bent on hunting elk and may not be able to use a .45, I see no reason a .45 won't do just as good for you as a .50.
Thanks for starting this thread. I was thinking this the other day as I'm having decision paralysis on exactly what to buy in my first ML. Looks like I should start with a 45!
Im not familar with a solid copper Hornady that frags. Im familar with a Lehigh Controlled Fracturing that is quite lethal for deer and elk. As a matter of fact the only Hornady mono copper im aware of for MLs is the Monoflex and ive never seen anyone post about fragmentation issues. Even if you did blow all the petal off i bet it still weighs in over 200gr. Ive done the same thing with a Barnes 45LC 225gr XPB. Shot it at 2300fps+ and blew the petals off. The bullet still weighed slightly over 200gr and its extremely lethal on deer.A super velocity highly accurate solid copper is pretty useless if it fragments on impact under 50 yards! (hint... Hornady)
Enter your email address to join: