B bkwheat28 Member Joined Nov 30, 2017 Messages 19 Reaction score 0 Nov 18, 2018 #1 Couldn’t find anything search. For some reason remember them being .220. Anybody know for sure? Trying to do some ballistic calculations.
Couldn’t find anything search. For some reason remember them being .220. Anybody know for sure? Trying to do some ballistic calculations.
D Dave C Well-Known Member * Joined Jun 11, 2015 Messages 228 Reaction score 6 Nov 18, 2018 #2 I believe they're .202
N NewlyMinted Member Joined Nov 10, 2018 Messages 19 Reaction score 1 Dec 2, 2018 #3 Would the 420g and the 460g have the same BC?
dbowling Supporter Supporting member * Joined Nov 5, 2005 Messages 3,265 Reaction score 1,484 Dec 2, 2018 #4 your best bet for the exact specs is to email Dave at no excuses and ask him. NewlyMinted said: Would the 420g and the 460g have the same BC? Click to expand...
your best bet for the exact specs is to email Dave at no excuses and ask him. NewlyMinted said: Would the 420g and the 460g have the same BC? Click to expand...
52Bore Well-Known Member * Joined Jul 26, 2014 Messages 2,840 Reaction score 1,387 Dec 2, 2018 #5 With my 50/475 bullet the RonL and I worked on HP diameters for expansion, my trajectory came out with a BC - 0.3 That weight bullet should be close. Written after middle HP. Attachments A1A1EC37-A59C-4301-A346-1E40B690AA60.jpeg 97.5 KB · Views: 105 4160CD94-FE21-4BE8-B341-35952E8B6D56.jpeg 122.9 KB · Views: 105
With my 50/475 bullet the RonL and I worked on HP diameters for expansion, my trajectory came out with a BC - 0.3 That weight bullet should be close. Written after middle HP.