Choice of scope

Modern Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Modern Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

vpsalin

Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2015
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Between the two choices which scope do you prefer on your muzzleloader

Bushnell Elite 3200, 2-7x32
Bushnell Legend Ultra HD 3-9x50

Both are multi-x
 
Which muzzleloader, it would make a difference.

Sent from my ME301T using Tapatalk
 
Between the two, I'd choose the 2-7x. Have it mounted as low as possible. It will be plenty of scope for hunting anything you'll be hunting with a muzzle loader.
 
I'd go with the higher power myself. I've used a 50mm for many years with no issues. If you have an issue with getting down on the stock, its easy to fix with items you already have at home. You can't hit what you can't see.

From the Bushnell site: "Unfortunately Bushnell Elite 3200 2-7x32 Riflescope Matte 322732M Multi X Reticle is no longer carried by BushnellOptics."
http://www.bushnelloptics.com/bushnell- ... 2732m.html

The 3-9x50 includes the side focus parallax.
 
You may want to review some of these comments on the Nikon Inline scope. I have one on my Accura V2 & my son has the 3x9x 40mm on his MR.

http://www.cabelas.com/product/Nikon-Inline-XR-Muzzleloader-Scope/1579182.uts

IMG_2743.jpg
 
The Elite 3500 3-9x40 would be a good mix of the 2. The rainguard really does work as advertised. And it's hard to go wrong with a 3-9x40
 
Definately the Elite! 2-7x32mm power is all you need. I have that sane scope on a rifle. Amazing light gathering ability, solid made, and just a nice scope in the woods.
 
Back
Top