G'day all,
I've been back and forthing and have decided I probably will just buy a pedersoli hawken hunter. But to lay out that type of money I want to be sure it is the gun I'll be happy with.
My preference has always been for flintlock purely from a historical/romance/cool factor, the caplock for me fits in with a seemingly more practical side and also fits in with my fascination of the US civil war era.
Looking at it though is there a clear advantage to one over the other in the field?
In Australia we do very little hunting from stands, it's all spot and stalk or bush stalking so your gun is exposed to the weather which in autumn through spring can be warm and nice or windy and raining. There can at times be a lot of Bush bashing through thick crap so it will get dinged and donged. Climbing over logs or crawling on the ground tilts and tios the gun at all angles.
Is there a clear winner in these scenarios?
Are there any other pros/cons to either? Specifically in terms of maintenance, cleaning etc.
Thank you.
I've been back and forthing and have decided I probably will just buy a pedersoli hawken hunter. But to lay out that type of money I want to be sure it is the gun I'll be happy with.
My preference has always been for flintlock purely from a historical/romance/cool factor, the caplock for me fits in with a seemingly more practical side and also fits in with my fascination of the US civil war era.
Looking at it though is there a clear advantage to one over the other in the field?
In Australia we do very little hunting from stands, it's all spot and stalk or bush stalking so your gun is exposed to the weather which in autumn through spring can be warm and nice or windy and raining. There can at times be a lot of Bush bashing through thick crap so it will get dinged and donged. Climbing over logs or crawling on the ground tilts and tios the gun at all angles.
Is there a clear winner in these scenarios?
Are there any other pros/cons to either? Specifically in terms of maintenance, cleaning etc.
Thank you.