Buck Conner1
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2015
- Messages
- 4,592
- Reaction score
- 558
I just got my new issues of Muzzleloader Magazine is the reason I'm mentioning this.... and this is not the first time one of their writer's pulls this on the public. Now he's writing for another magazine and doing the same thing.
Have you ever noticed how some of these gun writers (modern or muzzleloading) seem to copy each other, just reword the same thoughts year after year. A few of these guys must think we're stupid as they repeat the same information they had written a dozen years ago and act like this is new stuff. :thumb down:
Several writers have told us how you can tell if the company gave them the gun or asked for it to be returned.
And we read this stuff expecting to get a heads-up on what's good, bad or junk. You really didn't get anything for the $5 bucks it cost for the magazine. :Questuon: :thumb down:
Have you ever noticed how some of these gun writers (modern or muzzleloading) seem to copy each other, just reword the same thoughts year after year. A few of these guys must think we're stupid as they repeat the same information they had written a dozen years ago and act like this is new stuff. :thumb down:
Several writers have told us how you can tell if the company gave them the gun or asked for it to be returned.
- If the article raves how great the firearm is - in some cases that means the writer just added another gun to his personal collection whether junk or so-so.
- If the article is average, doesn't really talk the firearm up as being better than others can mean the writer was asked to return the weapon.