Nikon Omega

[nate121080]

Has anyone got a chance to look through them? 5" constant eye relief, light weight, and short. All what I'm looking for. Just wonder if it will have the same lens and coatings as the UCC's.

 

[Anonymous]

Here's a snazzy video for you:

http://www.nikonsportoptics.com/journal_splash.php?launchhunting=1


They call it "constant" eye relief, but it isn't. The lens are "multi-coated," not fully multi-coated, and the internal adjustments are a bit skimpy @ 60 inches.

I wasn't particularly thrilled with it at all-- but some may be.

 

[nate121080]

thanks for the info Randy. Figured it was to good to be true

Nate

 

[encoreguy]

For the money they are actually very good. I would compare them to Bushnell 3200, Burris Fullfield II's and Leupold vari II's. I am not sure I like the BDC reticle, for me the old mil-dot would do nicely. IMHO Very nice scope for the money, I don't think you would be disappointed. I have several burris, Leupold and now Nikon scopes.

 

[n8dawg6]

i believe the lens and coatings on the omega are equivalent to the buckmaster scopes . . . a step below the monarchs (but still good). the light transmission for the omega (and the buckmasters this year) is a claimed 92%, which is pretty good.