I recently used a Bushnell sport rangefinder on my latest archery hunt and found its performance dismal at best. I needed to trigger the laser upto 7-8 times before getting a reading on close targets (under 100 yards). I tried to range the antlers of a 175 inch buck bedded in front of me and could not get a reading no matter how much I tried. Is it too much to expect a rangefinder to range antlers at 45 yards? I could occasionally get a quick accurate reading if it was a vehicle sized object at 150 yards or less, but this isn't the performance I expected.
If I spend the money and buy a Leica Rangemaster 900 scan, can I expect better results. And by better, I really mean flawless results, or am I expecting too much?
I would love to hear about your experiences.
If I spend the money and buy a Leica Rangemaster 900 scan, can I expect better results. And by better, I really mean flawless results, or am I expecting too much?
I would love to hear about your experiences.