- Joined
- Jul 26, 2016
- Messages
- 1,176
- Reaction score
- 232
Im in also
whether you agree or dissagree with the NMLRA there is no doubt it is a good thing.This is gonna sound a little mushy. A person can find good or bad in just about anything or anyone. I learned a long time ago life is much more enjoyable if you look for the good. I try hard not to dwell on the bad.
Other than Customs there will never be a mass produced smokless muzzleloader built again. The reason being unless you double load a muzzleloader (powder bullet powder bullet ) you will not blow up a rifle with Black powder or black powder subs. Smokless powder is a whole different story. I feel that is the reason the NMLRA will never allow smokless. Myself personally i would never allow smokless either . Just not worth the risk.
The guys that host smokless matches are for the most part hosting a match for their own rifles. They have either built the guns or sold parts to have the guns built.(for the most part) It is pretty much is a select group of people that know what they are doing.
I can not say enough good about the NMLRA. I appreciate everything they are doing and have done. Sometimes there may be a little bickering but what organization doesnt have that ? If you add any kind of competition there will ALWAYS be complainers . Even though I do not compete with a traditional style rifle(YET !) I very much enjoy reading about them. I only wish i would of known about the NMLRA years ago.
Also some people have had or heard from people that have had bad experiance so judged it as whole , but I can not give you an answer other then going to the National Match to see for yourself. I do know that from nothing to 4 or more matches for Inlines is great progress . Like this sight dedicated to Inlines they are dedicated to all aspects as a whole . I'm just not educated enough to explain. I myself wish they had a section like this sight , even in the Magazine. Maybe that is why people such as yourself should become members. They are always looking for articles written by members to put in the magazineI'm not saying it is. But if I didn't know better and just saw the website for the first time, I could sure be lead to that conclusion real quick and would give them a section one thought after I left the page.
Enter your email address to join: