Primer failure

Modern Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Modern Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Try what Ed says. I would remove old nipple, clean the inside of it. Inspect it very good, then take some sand paper and very carefully sand the edge down , bevel it slightly where the cap sits on it. The 1075 are an excellent hotter cap they are just a whisker smaller than the number 11. This should fix your problem…
 
Try what Ed says. I would remove old nipple, clean the inside of it. Inspect it very good, then take some sand paper and very carefully sand the edge down , bevel it slightly where the cap sits on it. The 1075 are an excellent hotter cap they are just a whisker smaller than the number 11. This should fix your problem…
Thank you.
 
Everyone, take a 2nd look at the side view of the hammer/nipple alignment... It ain't quite square.
It's striking the bottom half of the nipple, so a shorter nipple may be in order.
 
Has this rifle been dry fired? That may peen or “mushroom” the nipple, making it impossible to seat your caps.

Nipples don’t cost much. I would replace it, regardless.

Good luck!

Bob Turkeytrack
 
Here’s a new finding. The hammer coil spring is working against the inletting for the lock. I believe I should correct the inletting. What’s the advice from this site?
Thank you all.
My opinion is that you absolutely have to correct the inletting to eliminate the interference. I recommend removing the wood just a little at a time, and after each removal, putting a little lipstick on the wood, re-assembling the rifle, dry firing (with a thick piece of rubber or leather over the nipple to keep it from getting damaged), and then taking the lock back out to see whether there are marks in the lipstick, or there's lipstick on the coil spring.

In addition to corrrecting the inletting, I also recommend inspecting, correcting if necessary, and polishing the metal parts in your lock. Here's why:

When I bought a new-in-the-box TC Renegade last year, it seemed to me that there was lots of friction when I cocked the hammer, and that the hammer strike was weak, and very slow. When I took the lock apart, I found that several burrs on metal parts that moved against other metal parts had actually engraved grooves, and I also found that many metal surfaces that slide against each other as the lock is cocked and then fired were quite rough. So... I removed the burrs, first with a fine flat file, and then with abrasive paper. Then I carefully polished all metal surfaces that move against each other, starting with 800 grit paper, and finishing with 4,000 grit paper. While I have no way of measuring these things, there doesn't seem to be any friction at all when I cock the hammer now, I'd be willing to bet that the lock time has been cut in half, or maybe more, and the hammer strike is very forceful. I didn't fire the rifle until these things were done, but I've now fired around 100 rounds, and haven't had a single misfire, despite using caps that are around 10 years old, and despite using T7 that was about 8 years old for the majority of the shots I've fired.

I have had two "snabangs," though - one of them when I forgot to clear the flash channel by firing a couple of caps before starting my shooting session, and one that may have been due to contamination of powder that was left in the rifle through a two-week hunting season. See my thread "Powder Contamination in Hunting Muzzle-Loaders?" if you're curious about the details of these "snabangs", and possible solutions.
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Back
Top