- Joined
- Dec 29, 2007
- Messages
- 4,960
- Reaction score
- 3,153
It is raining here, and seems it will rain all day; not much to do, so make a poll.
[/quote]1874sharpsshooter;4199102]Ignorance , thats what i think is the primary reason . But i didnt see that listed in the poll so i didnt vote
Chet, i must respectively disagree.Ignorance , thats what i think is the primary reason . But i didnt see that listed in the poll so i didnt vote
Haven't been able to find the wrong primer in any rifle here. Have tried STS, CCI, CCImag, W209, and 209A.bestill said:Need2 choices wrong primer or breech plug design
ronlaughlin said:Haven't been able to find the wrong primer in any rifle here. Have tried STS, CCI, CCImag, W209, and 209A.bestill said:Need2 choices wrong primer or breech plug design
Squeeze said:I dont think Packed or loose powder in a factor at all. the way its an extruded powder, its design inherently leaves small voids throughout the powder column. any bullet should be well seated over any powder. But Packing it, or using excessive seating pressure, in my opinion is a moot factor, or just another internet myth.
bestill said:ronlaughlin said:Haven't been able to find the wrong primer in any rifle here. Have tried STS, CCI, CCImag, W209, and 209A.bestill said:Need2 choices wrong primer or breech plug design
Try some triple seven primers in a knight mountaineer and you will have found wrong primer
bestill said:ronlaughlin said:Haven't been able to find the wrong primer in any rifle here. Have tried STS, CCI, CCImag, W209, and 209A.bestill said:Need2 choices wrong primer or breech plug design
Try some triple seven primers in a knight mountaineer and you will have found wrong primer
use two 0.060" veggie fiber wads on my lead conicals that are sized 0.001" over bore size