I don't want the thread to derail, but Ohio has in it's Revised Code a process for those under disability to remove that disability. What it boils down to is you serve your time, do any probation you have, keep your nose clean for a few years, and build a stable life (stable housing, job, ect). Then you petition a court to review that and so long as your evidence indicates to the court that you have "turned it around", and are unlikely to go back and commit more offenses, the court is supposed to issue an order removing the disability. There are 2 problems: 1. is that most people in that position don't look at the law, and a good amount of effort is made to keep it from public knowledge, and 2. like everywhere in this country, an over abundance of courts adjudicated by judges who refuse to see reason and follow the law.
In theory, it's not a horrible idea, it makes it more difficult for people who will misuse firearms (If it were legit about public safety, it should be any item designed as or carried as a weapon, IMO, firearms aren't the only weapon a criminal can use, and if I supposedly can't trust you with a gun, I don't want you to have anything else either) from being able to get them (or at least, allow us to tack on even more time if they commit another crime with one); yet it allows people who just screwed up, and aren't going to be doing whatever they did again, the ability to go back to exercising all their rights.
Unfortunately, the reality is that for various reasons, it doesn't work out as it should; and too many good people are deprived of their rights long after they've served their time and gotten on with their lives, for no good reason.
Companies are too lazy to read the laws/implement simple policies to do business "in good faith", and so they screw all of us over lol. The fact that this particular company, like others, claim that they "CANNOT SHIP TO THE STATE ENTERED! YOU MUST PROVIDE AN FFL DEALER ADDRESS WHO CAN RECEIVE THE ITEM/ITEMS."; I don't like being lied to, and this is a blatant lie. Rather than just stating that they don't want to sell you a gun you can legally have sent to you (because they don't want to read the law), they are trying to blame the law for why they "can't" send you it. I could go on, but it's going to get political, and this isn't the place.