The pro wolf/anti hunting/ANTI GUN/leftists file lawsuits EVERY time a state tries to bring a wolf season into effect to manage the population. And of course they put the issue in front of a liberal judge and we all know the outcome of that case. (And then the lawyers get to bill the tax-payers).
What chaps me is that there would be no ungulates for a wolf to even live off of if it were not for the North American Game Conservation Model, which is SOLELY the result of sportsman's efforts and MONEY.
The wolf is not even remotely at risk of being "exterminated", which implies going extinct. There are plenty of wolves alive and thriving in Canada and Alaska in areas where their presence is tolerable. Not to mention the population in Europe, and Asia. If you think it is okay to bring wolves into my state (Colorado), how about we bring a few hundred to Indiana and see how that fiasco would play out? Maybe a couple hundred grizzly bears as well?
What chaps me is that there would be no ungulates for a wolf to even live off of if it were not for the North American Game Conservation Model, which is SOLELY the result of sportsman's efforts and MONEY.
The wolf is not even remotely at risk of being "exterminated", which implies going extinct. There are plenty of wolves alive and thriving in Canada and Alaska in areas where their presence is tolerable. Not to mention the population in Europe, and Asia. If you think it is okay to bring wolves into my state (Colorado), how about we bring a few hundred to Indiana and see how that fiasco would play out? Maybe a couple hundred grizzly bears as well?