Could you imagine?

Modern Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Modern Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

BP_HideHunter

Well-Known Member
*
Joined
Aug 20, 2022
Messages
72
Reaction score
197
Being a soldier or someone who relied on 69 cal round balls? I casted 73 today, many of the first casts went back in the pot until I got the mold good and hot.

This is nearly 4 1/2 pounds of soft lead, wouldn't want to carry that all at once, unless my life depended on it I suppose!

IMG_20221009_154712468.jpg
 
If my memory is correct. I believe one of the Confederate battalions marched about 13 miles to Gettysburg and then proceeded to attack one of the hills there. I forget which one, but talk about being tired, thirsty, and hungry, can you imagine it being done today?
 
Not to mention the miles traveled on foot with the footwear that was available to them back then. I can’t imagine how painful that must have been for their feet and legs. Different breed of men. Definition of tough.
Real men back in them days, way too many males these days if put back in time would be lost, helpless & curled up in a ball cryin mommy in less than a day.
 
Many LE departments around here are transitioning away from shotguns, more toward rifles, for any time a long gun is deployed.

A handful of slugs seem to weigh about the same as a magazine for the AR. 😆 (Plus, you can reach out, if needed.)
 
Compared to today's soldiers, 19th Century and prior soldiers were incredibly tough!!

First, consider tough training in a modern army: During one of the nights I spent in Ranger School, towards the end of a continuous patrol that lasted 12 days on about one C-ration per man per day and maybe 4 hours of sleep (in 30 minute snatches) per day, we moved about 8 miles through the mangrove swamps of Eglin Air Force Base (Florida) carrying our standard 50 lbs of gear plus weapons, radios, etc (everybody had at least 65 lbs, and many had close to 100 lbs), carried out an ambush, and then did 5 miles at double-time. For modern soldiers that's pretty tough training - of the 450 hand-picked ROTC and West Point cadets who started that Ranger class in 1977, only 175 of us graduated. I was a wiry bicycle racer who was used to riding up to 100 miles at a time in those days, but I still lost about 40 pounds during Ranger School.

Then consider Davout's Corps at the Battle of Austerlitz during the Napoleonic Wars: They marched close to 80 miles in roughly 24 hours, and after arriving on the battlefield early in the morning, they got thrown into the toughest fighting of the battle, which lasted for an entire day. Physical demands like that, combined with poor wartime food, sanitary conditions, and medical care are a big part of the reason that disease and injuries caused more casualties in every war that the US fought prior to Viet Nam.

Casualty rates and the causes of casualties during the American Civil War provide another example of just how brutal wartime conditions must have been: Prior to their military service, most Civil War soldiers had been tough enough to survive their childhood and teenage years under the incredible physical workloads, poor diet and sanitary conditions, and practically nonexistent medical care of 19th Century farm life - which would literally kill 99% of modern Americans in under a month. Nevertheless, Civil War regiments generally had about 900 men when they started training, but by the time a typical regiment saw its first combat, disease and injuries had already reduced its strength to about 450 men. And after a full year of combat, many regiments were down to 25 men, with disease and non-combat injuries being responsible for most of the losses.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top