The gun will shoot.maybe in a year or two the MRX series will be better after CVA figures out that folks won't buy guns that wobble and aren't accurate .
is CVA's optima series still safe to buy ?
The gun will shoot.maybe in a year or two the MRX series will be better after CVA figures out that folks won't buy guns that wobble and aren't accurate .
is CVA's optima series still safe to buy ?
ooohhh .... ok . so the problem is just fit and finish/build quality . but not to the degree that it seems to impair accuracy ?The gun will shoot.
My gun locks up nice, the front forearm is off a bit. But it's a budget gun. Mass production is not going to perfect.ooohhh .... ok . so the problem is just fit and finish/build quality . but not to the degree that it seems to impair accuracy ?
The .50 cals seem to be getting better reviews than the .45s. The Optimas only come in .50 and are sounding like the better deal lately.maybe in a year or two the MRX series will be better after CVA figures out that folks won't buy guns that wobble and aren't accurate .
is CVA's optima series still safe to buy ?
Yeah I thought the same thing.CVA’s definition of accurate?!
I will gladly help you guys get rid of all them cva muzzleloader that won't shoot. I can pm you my address.Yeah I thought the same thing.
Them calling a 2.5” group at only 100yds a “ good group “ with a modern scoped inline is BS.
I have zero probs or complaints with my Accura V2 or my Paramount. I'm sorry for the guys that got crappy barrels on their new guns.I will gladly help you guys get rid of all them cva muzzleloader that won't shoot. I can pm you my address.
I bet he will sell you his brand new gun for 80 cents on the dollar. Any gun that it’s best is 2&1/2” when shot at the factory, prob from a gun vice with a scope, you can have. Might be able to improve. Might not.I will gladly help you guys get rid of all them cva muzzleloader that won't shoot. I can pm you my address.
Sadly, your post is 100% - on point. There really is no acceptable excuse for it either. CVA/Bergara had the prime opportunity to boldly step to the forefront of the modern muzzleloading world, & they completely blew it.These .45 barrels on the new models truly have problems! And if you point that out on one of their pages, your posts are apt to disappear (Fakebook). The criticism is well deserved. I don't know what's going on but when I'm told a sloppy-assed barrel meets their specs you really have to wonder what's happened. The Bergara barrel reputation is no longer deserved.
Im thinking that talking to Mark Woodman about making a replacement barrel for an MR-X .45 is a good way to get a great MLSadly, your post is 100% - on point. There really is no acceptable excuse for it either. CVA/Bergara had the prime opportunity to boldly step to the forefront of the modern muzzleloading world, & they completely blew it.
Yessir, great idea. If - you can get Mark to do it, he's extremely overloaded with his production guns & the project guns he's taken on. It sure wouldn't hurt to ask him about doing one, or doing a Kodiak SML conversion - like the Omegas.Im thinking that talking to Mark Woodman about making a replacement barrel for an MR-X .45 is a good way to get a great ML
If you have one that has barrel issues and the barrel has no wobble. Accurize the barrel and try grouping using several powders and bullets. Even the worst I've seen will shoot 2.5 groups.Yeah I thought the same thing.
Them calling a 2.5” group at only 100yds a “ good group “ with a modern scoped inline is BS.
Thanks hairybirdIf you have one that has barrel issues and the barrel has no wobble. Accurize the barrel and try grouping using several powders and bullets. Even the worst I've seen will shoot 2.5 groups.
Enter your email address to join: