For the life of me, I cannot understand why shoot a 50 caliber ML. The 45 behaves better ballistically, the projections of equal weights have a better sectional density in 45 caliber. Also, for those using a sabot in the 50 cal, the projectiles are all 44/45 cal anyway. It just does not make sense.
Furthermore, since the chamber in a 45 cal is smaller than the 50 cal, equivalent grain loads of powder have higher pressures, hense better velocity in the 45 cal.
With that said, why does the world love the 50 cal so much? Magnum mania? I don't know.
Back in the late 70's and early 80's when I got into muzle loading, I built my own kentucky and hawken rifles. The only caliber they came in those days was 45 caliber. So why are we stuck with the 50 now so much?
The whole situation just burns me up sometimes. Just like when I hear people trash the good old 30-30 as a useless round. Sure, the 30-30 may not be fancy, but it still takes more deer on the east coast than about anything else. I guess I am slowly turning into a grumpy old bastard!
Furthermore, since the chamber in a 45 cal is smaller than the 50 cal, equivalent grain loads of powder have higher pressures, hense better velocity in the 45 cal.
With that said, why does the world love the 50 cal so much? Magnum mania? I don't know.
Back in the late 70's and early 80's when I got into muzle loading, I built my own kentucky and hawken rifles. The only caliber they came in those days was 45 caliber. So why are we stuck with the 50 now so much?
The whole situation just burns me up sometimes. Just like when I hear people trash the good old 30-30 as a useless round. Sure, the 30-30 may not be fancy, but it still takes more deer on the east coast than about anything else. I guess I am slowly turning into a grumpy old bastard!