- Joined
- Nov 11, 2018
- Messages
- 8,399
- Reaction score
- 12,079
If we get 15 people in for $20 (30 for $10) we can get Ron a nice late/early birthday present. I'm in for $20, if someone else wants to setup a gofundme or something.
The depth of the rifling engraved in the bullet is most interesting. Only 80g Blackhorn, and compared to the barrel, the rifling engraved in the bullet is quite deep.
If we all pony up a couple bucks we could buy Ron this reusable gel block. Maybe end the uncertainties if he's using industry standard, too.
https://www.clearballistics.com/shop/10-ballistic-gelatin-sniper-pack-2-16x6x6/
Read post #12 , there were 4 different questionsRead post 11, If that’s not it? Ask again
I'd be in.If we get 15 people in for $20 (30 for $10) we can get Ron a nice late/early birthday present. I'm in for $20, if someone else wants to setup a gofundme or something.
Me tooIf we get 15 people in for $20 (30 for $10) we can get Ron a nice late/early birthday present. I'm in for $20, if someone else wants to setup a gofundme or something.
Explain the difference then between the INDUSTRY STANDARD test and Ron's test, and why the bullet functions properly in the INDUSTRY STANDARD test, yet fails in Ron's test?
Which test should the multitude of readers determine best represents the bullets they hunt with?
Why do the hunters using both smokers and SML state the bullet works exceptionally well on game?
Did or do you ever think, that posting "FAIL" and "isn't surprising", might just affect someone's livelihood or employees?
1, Industry Standard? Who was talking about industry Standard here? This is RON L’s Test that is being discussed, YOU are the one that Started the “Industry Standard” Stuff
2, which test? Whichever Test the USER Chooses to use? The Choice is Theirs, A great thing about living in the USA, Having the Freedom to Make your Own Decision
3, exceptionally well on game? This is a Guess, as i have no hands on experience with these Bullets. But After seeing RON L’s Test, And Reading 45-70s Post about 80 Grains of BH209 Not being enough, My guess is They are Pushing these Bullets HARD
4, affect someone’s livelihood or Employees? I guess if Speaking the Truth, Giving an Honest opinion does that? I simply gave my Honest Opinion of these Bullets as a HUNTING Bullet at Normal Muzzleloader Velocities, Especially a Long Range Hunting Bullet, after seeing RON L’s Tests. I have nothing in the World against Fury Bullets, or ANY other Bullet Company for that matter, I call things the way I see them, The way they are Layed out in front of me. I have put more time in the Field than MANY EVER will begin to. I have been through, and seen a LOT in that time
If we all pony up a couple bucks we could buy Ron this reusable gel block. Maybe end the uncertainties if he's using industry standard, too.
https://www.clearballistics.com/shop/10-ballistic-gelatin-sniper-pack-2-16x6x6/
Its always the debate for you along with how you treat those who disagree with you
I also find rifling marks on bullets interesting, I have a bag full of different bullets that i saved.
Seems to indicate one may be able to get by with 90 or 95 grain loads. Worth a look anyway.
Love it how you avoid answering legit questions, failing to answer a single one. Instead of answering legit questions, you refer to "your Beloved" and think its funny. SMH I've said it before and will say it again, you're more ready for an argument, belittling and laughing, than determining facts, or coming to conclusions.
I'm betting an INDUSTRY STANDARD test will likely be coming.
I think both of you are right to a degree and both are wrong to a degree. To really make valid arguments, you need to eliminate the apples to oranges stuff though.
One gun using identical components, weighed charges of the same lot of the same powder, bullets from the same lot, done the same day at roughly the same time, done at the same identical distance, two entirely different mediums for catching the bullets....this is called control and offers as close to scientific results as you could expect. If another test using a lighter charge weight is desired, every component of the test has to remain identical except the charge weight. Change any one aspect of the testing you want, one aspect at a time, but everything has to remain the same with all other elements involved.
Leave different gun types and powder types out of the fray. Leave two entirely different tests using entirely different catch mediums out of it too. Ron has one focus using non-conventional materials to do what he does. The ballistic gel "standardization" testing is done using very controlled materials.....two entirely different tests so whatever the results, there is nothing valid if the end results are to be compared. Apples to oranges guys. You're both right but you're both wrong. Kiss and make up now.
People I know have used these bullets on game. No good results from them at all. After seeing Ron’s tests, I see why. But if your not using a good bullet you wouldn’t understand why.
Enter your email address to join: