- Joined
- Dec 4, 2009
- Messages
- 7,554
- Reaction score
- 8,213
They would still be able to use non-transmitting (old skool) cameras.
Any bill like this is “practically” unenforceable.
I’m sure it would be a “report and get a reward” type of situation. I live in Utah and use my trail cams in only one area I hunt. Some years there’s a few elk in there, some years there’s not one. There’s always hundreds of trail cameras. Every water hole will have several on it.I absolutely agree. I cannot imagine how DNR can police trailcams. Does this apply only to public land? I don't see how they could apply it to private property.
IDK, maybe their thought is that cameras take away from "fair chase ". Gives the hunter an advantage in that he can sorta predict when an animal will pass through the particular spot.What I don't understand is the banning of trailcams. It just doesn't make sense to me.
What I don't understand is the banning of trailcams. It just doesn't make sense to me.
Enter your email address to join: