I hope this isn't a repost but if so I appreciate your input non the less.
I'm wanting to scope my newly aquired Knight Disc Extreme for next years Deer Season. The gun came with a 3-9x40 Tasco scope on it but I have a better scope on hand. It's a Bushnell 3200 Elite which I've read great reviews about. I don't really know enough about scopes to know what's what and haven't yet had time to look through them side by side but from everything I've read the Bushnell should end up being the better of the two. Over on a shotgun forum when I made mention of the possibility of using the 3-9 on a shotgun several people spoke against it stating that although it was a good scope that I should concentrate more so on a 1-4x variable scope with a longer eye relief.
Does the same apply for this Knight ML? Is the Bushnell 3-9 too much scope for the gun or am I all set here with the Bushnell or Tasco either one.
Thanks for the input.
Roach
I'm wanting to scope my newly aquired Knight Disc Extreme for next years Deer Season. The gun came with a 3-9x40 Tasco scope on it but I have a better scope on hand. It's a Bushnell 3200 Elite which I've read great reviews about. I don't really know enough about scopes to know what's what and haven't yet had time to look through them side by side but from everything I've read the Bushnell should end up being the better of the two. Over on a shotgun forum when I made mention of the possibility of using the 3-9 on a shotgun several people spoke against it stating that although it was a good scope that I should concentrate more so on a 1-4x variable scope with a longer eye relief.
Does the same apply for this Knight ML? Is the Bushnell 3-9 too much scope for the gun or am I all set here with the Bushnell or Tasco either one.
Thanks for the input.
Roach