- Joined
- May 19, 2005
- Messages
- 9,205
- Reaction score
- 1,736
Next question can it be loaded as loose powder?
If you look at that shelf its angled just like a cf shoulder on the bottom or powder side . Even if it unrolls the tbing is larger than the shelfs hole by a significant margine . I can see this is not being understood for its ability to significantly boost velocity . Or this t8 ability to do it safely . I repeat , its a Big Deal !!!!!!!Guessing that the portion of the "hull" mouth comprising the roll crimp, unrolls to the rear face of that shelf and creates a consistent "chamber" diameter until expanding in the beginning of the rifled bore against the projectile's base, rather than allowing the expanding gases to run up against any inflexible constrictions in diameter. Just a theory.
(For something almost none of us want to say we would ever buy, this system sure is stimulating some interesting technical conversation and SWAGs!)
I agree but i sure hope that powder is sold loose !!!!! Tbe 700ml i got is still on the drawing board and id make use of T8 and a velocity chamber in 40 or 45 thats for sure !!!!!!!!!!!Iowa Reg.
"MUZZLELOADERS: Flintlock or percussion cap muzzleloading rifles or muskets between .44 and .775 caliber shooting single projectiles; muzzleloading pistols .44 caliber or larger. Muzzleloaders equipped with electronic ignition are not allowed. In-line and disk-type muzzleloaders are allowed. Riflescopes may also be used."
Most likely, it will be legal in Iowa. I believe I read where the stick may cost around $2.60 a shot. I can get BH209 for $19 (last years price) a bottle on clearance,at Walmart. That sale should start pretty soon. I average about $.45 a shot with the different loads I shoot, anywhere from 70-120gr Volume in my rifles. Factor in my hunting bullet at $1-$1.80 a bullet, I'm shooting a $1.50-$2.30 hunting load, still cheaper than one stick. That alone, will keep me from using that stick.
I believed that to be a card too . This T8 could be very promiseing . Thats about all i see here that interests me .I couldn't care less about the rifle. The fact that it's a Traditions inline precludes me from purchasing one. I'm real interested in this as a loose powder. I'm guessing the potential is there in the chemical engineering field to develop a corrosion free BP sub. Maybe? My thought is that if this new setup is really designed to be trouble free, maybe that's where they went with it.
I don't think the tube unrolls. To me it looks like it's a lot thicker plastic and has a card on the end that burns/blows out the end. Also notice there's a large hole in the bottom where the primer goes. There has to be some sort of plastic or glue, something that will burn quickly but can still seal up watertight.
I couldn't care less about the rifle. The fact that it's a Traditions inline precludes me from purchasing one. I'm real interested in this as a loose powder. I'm guessing the potential is there in the chemical engineering field to develop a corrosion free BP sub. Maybe? My thought is that if this new setup is really designed to be trouble free, maybe that's where they went with it.
I don't think the tube unrolls. To me it looks like it's a lot thicker plastic and has a card on the end that burns/blows out the end. Also notice there's a large hole in the bottom where the primer goes. There has to be some sort of plastic or glue, something that will burn quickly but can still seal up watertight.
Nice work, I love detail "a picture is worth 1,000 words"The CAD Drawing cutaway shows the tube to have tapered walls, and a Roll Crimp.
View attachment 7245
I took the liberty to brighten and zoom in.
View attachment 7250 View attachment 7246
However the real thing does look a little different.
View attachment 7249
Notice the end appears to have been heated and roll crimped over what appears to me to be a pressed styrofoam over powder wad. It has to be something like styrofoam, that will disintegrate as soon as the charge is ignited.
View attachment 7248
The primer pocket on the CAD Drawing appears to have a thin polymer membrane that the primer will have to burn through.
View attachment 7247
It would be nice to see a cutaway of the actual FiddleStick. Then it would leave no question as to what is really going on.
The truly cool part is what i said earlier Busta . THATS the true tech !!! That fiddlestick reminds me of the old Active Shotshells hull . Really nothing new . Tbeyve built in bottleneck preformance tbat is integral to this system . Never before in bpowder bistory has this been done sucessfully . That powder IS SPECIAL . The DeLaval Constriction is what is used in rocket engines and spaceflight . Its part of the laws of pbysics in operation , ie ---.Bernouilli's principle primarily . Dont miss whats going on with their system . It IS historical . Does this make it an mz.....kinda , proprietary definately . Its all about that beveled ledge and Hodgdons T8 .The CAD Drawing cutaway shows the tube to have tapered walls, and a Roll Crimp.
View attachment 7245
I took the liberty to brighten and zoom in.
View attachment 7250 View attachment 7246
However the real thing does look a little different.
View attachment 7249
Notice the end appears to have been heated and roll crimped over what appears to me to be a pressed styrofoam over powder wad. It has to be something like styrofoam, that will disintegrate as soon as the charge is ignited.
View attachment 7248
The primer pocket on the CAD Drawing appears to have a thin polymer membrane that the primer will have to burn through.
View attachment 7247
It would be nice to see a cutaway of the actual FiddleStick. Then it would leave no question as to what is really going on.
Could this have been executed differently ??? Sure , but it wouldnt belong to Traditions , and them alone . The fiddlestick charged with T8 are all equal parts in this rendition of " MINE". The T8 most of all cuz it makes it possible .The truly cool part is what i said earlier Busta . THATS the true tech !!! That fiddlestick reminds me of the old Active Shotshells hull . Really nothing new . Tbeyve built in bottleneck preformance tbat is integral to this system . Never before in bpowder bistory has this been done sucessfully . That powder IS SPECIAL . The DeLaval Constriction is what is used in rocket engines and spaceflight . Its part of the laws of pbysics in operation , ie ---.Bernouilli's principle primarily . Dont miss whats going on with their system . It IS historical . Does this make it an mz.....kinda , protiatary definately . Its all about that beveled ledge and Hodgdons T8 .
Dunno ??? But its not a powerbelt . My guess is you mean the federal borelock . Does seem like this space should cause trouble dont it ??the schematic has the powder recessed to the wad on the charge shell. Looks like its designed for that specific powerbelt proprietorially, with the recess designed to accommodate the powerbelts recessed base. This would leave almost any other projectile spaced off the charge. How must space is needed before the pressure spike becomes problematic?
Yep !!!! I dunno......the thread is long already, went back through and saw this. Isnt this exactly what we try to avoid? bulged barrels and worse have been caused by this sort of gap.
I have a feeling it depends on the amount of space and the pressure curve of the propellant.the thread is long already, went back through and saw this. Isnt this exactly what we try to avoid? bulged barrels and worse have been caused by this sort of gap.
At first I thought it would seat right in there, but that gap is alarming
Enter your email address to join: